The new battle for civil rights

Last week I cried.

It was the day the government almost shut down and Trump was on MSNBC’s Today using the theory that President Obama was not a citizen as a ploy for ratings.

And I thought about this thread I keep hearing in the political code, about America being for “real Americans” and working to make American the great nation it once was.

I cried because I know how great this country is and can be. Because I am an example of the American Dream and because I am disturbed by the racist political code that implies that Barak Obama isn’t a “real American.” I cried because I think about the nostalgia for the 50s and what seems like nostalgia for the pre-Civil Rights era.

Do we really want to go backwards, returning to a time of inequality for women and people of color? It wasn’t until the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that schools were desegregated (though one could argue that schools are still segregated, but by economics rather than race), and gender became a protected class under the law. The first Black American, and a woman, Shirley Chisolm ran for President in 1972 and in 1981 the first woman was appointed to the Supreme Court.

As many Civil Rights scholars will point out, civil rights and women’s rights are and have always been inextricably linked. And it is clear that women are being targeted with both the attack on labor unions (which exempted the male dominated industries such as fire and police), and in the current backlash against women’s health and reproductive rights.

Are women not “real Americans?” Are our grandparents, who were among the first to feel the tightening of the social safety net, not “real Americans?” Are poor Americans less American because they are poor? Is the 44th President — and the first African American President of the United States — not a real American because he is “African American?”

What of all the people who immigrate to the US thinking of the Statue of Liberty’s declaration to bring the cold, tired, hungry and huddled masses yearning to breathe free?

Is it that the United States of America is no longer the land of infinite possibility and opportunity?

I cried because it became very clear to me that there really are people who are enemies to my liberty and wish to reverse many of the things that make this country so great. People who would disparage the first black President with implications that his blackness makes him less American than his predecessors. People who would rather pit working people against each other, while they deny us the right to equal protection under the law.

Then I remembered that it was women who fought for women’s rights and workers who fought for workers rights and African Americans who fought for desegregation. It is the responsibility of those who value freedom to be ever vigilant to guard that freedom from those who would strip it away.

And all I can do is hold on to my deep and enduring hope and trust in the human spirit. Just as I was raised with the knowledge that people fought for the rights I enjoy today, my generation is being challenged to a new civil rights battle. Who knows how the battle will play out, but I know that I am read to do my part to fight for my freedom and the freedom of future generations.

Share

4 thoughts on “The new battle for civil rights

  1. Claudia Hall Christian

    The entire thing is weird. Seriously, if my family hadn’t been able to come here, we’d have been wiped off the planet. I don’t know where people get off saying ‘Yes, I immigrated here, but no one else should.’ I found that attitude when I lived in So. California (as a 4th generation Californian). It seems to have expanded to the world. It’s just weird.

  2. Pingback: BlackPrideNetwork » Blog Archive » The new battle for civil rights « Kymlee Is Awesome

  3. Pingback: The Battle is On « Kymlee Is Awesome

  4. Judith Bandsma

    It gets worse in the fight against women. If Topeka wins, you can count on the idea being presented everywhere. They are working to decriminalize domestic abuse. We had come a long way in that area and now they want to turn back the clock. Less pay for the same work and when you get home without ‘enough’ money in your paycheck, nobody’s going to even try to protect you when your spouse/significant other beats the shit out of you. And the city calls it a win because they save money on ‘domestic’ calls. Cuts or elimination of funding for women’s shelters and other protective programs.

    Re-inforcing this view of women, in case you haven’t been watching, is the gender-assignment of toys again. Girls in the kitchen or at the vanity table and boys with trucks, blocks, etc. It’s getting very scary again to be female.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *